Years ago, I tried (and by general consent failed) to develop as my party trick an impersonation of the Hollywood actor, Christopher Walken. When I donned his identity, I just said the one line: "I'm going to hurt you." To anyone familiar with Walken's films, the line, if not exactly side-splittingly hilarious, was supposed to be at least vaguely amusing: Walken had, after all, made his career on the back of playing psychopathic megalomaniacs whose sole purpose in life seemed to be to inflict unnecessary pain on various hapless victims. As I have never been a good mimic, however, I usually had to explain who I was trying to impersonate, at which point whatever little strength the joke possessed vanished like the morning mist in summertime.
That line - "I'm going to hurt you" has come back to my mind more times than I care to remember over the last few years as the language of pain and suffering has come to permeate mainstream modern discourse. Everywhere I look, I find people "processing their pain," "feeling the hurt," or reacting to comments from others that are variously described as "hurtful," "insensitive," or "cruel." It would seem that the world is being overrun by the evil spawn of Christopher Walken, to whom the "hurting" and the "pained" are now responding en masse. I might even propose a new law, to go alongside that of Godwin's. In fact, let's call it "Trueman's Second Law" (Trueman's First Law is known only to a few close friends, but, trust me, it has never been broken). Trueman's Second Law would be formulated something like this: in any exchange of views, sooner or later one or more of the participants will describe themselves as hurt or in pain as a result of somebody else's comment; and at that point it is clear that they have lost the real debate.
Read the entire post HERE.
5 comments:
What a hurtful thing to say! :p
Good one :)
Reminds me of the comic who said
"Sticks and stones may break my bones.... so please don't hit me with any sticks and stones..."
As I read men like Luther and Calvin I wonder where we would be if they had retreated to lick their wounds every time someone said something that hurt their feelings. What is more, consider the writings of Luther alone. He was not overcome with a desire to guard the "feelings" of everyone with which he interacted. I'm not saying we sould be cavalier in our dealings with others. Far from it. But we should not have a slavish commitment to never saying anything that could upset some folks.
Agree. Some folks need their feelings hurt and their sensibilities stretched. Until our egos are properly wounded, we don't need Jesus...
Paul talks somewhere in one of his epistles about knowing when to build up a struggling brother and when to use the 2x4 method. Both are appropriate depending on the circumstance.
Post a Comment