Most of us who grew up in evangelical churches were taught that the answers to everything from the presence of evil in the world to the population of heaven were ultimately due to human free will. It was almost reflexive. In fact, it would seem from many of the sermons and evangelistic invitations that many of us heard that the most unstoppable force in the universe was free will of mankind. We were assured that God never messes with free will (ala “Bruce Almighty”). “God is a gentleman. He never forces His will on anyone.” We can refer to this idea as “libertarian free will.” While not historically orthodox it is probably the default position of most American evangelicals. And while it is certainly true that such ideas are flattering to the human ego, I wonder if we ever stop to consider whether or not the Bible actually teaches the idea of libertarian free will. Also, do we ever consider whether or not God has free will?
So my question is: does the Bible teach that God’s human creatures have free will? At the risk of sounding like a coward I will answer by saying, “yes and no.” It all depends on what we mean by “free will.” If free will means that somehow our will is unencumbered by any forces external to us (libertarian free will) then, no, the Bible does not teach free will in that sense. Observations from our own lives confirm that we are constantly being acted upon by things as varied as the weather and the actions of others. Even traffic has an impact upon the choices we make. If a choice I make is impacted by, say, the weather then was my will truly “free”? It might be a good exercise to consider how many choices you make that are completely “free” from any force beyond yourself.
Consider, also, internal forces. Would a chemical imbalance render someone’s will less than free? Does depression hinder free will in any way? Does one’s upbringing, past abuse, or fear of failure make one’s will less free? Most importantly, does God, through the influence of the Holy Spirit have an impact on free will? Is this not, after all, why we pray for God to change someone’s heart? For those who believe in a libertarian idea of free will it seems inconsistent to pray for God to change someone’s heart if He never “messes” with free will.
My standard questions for the evangelical that accepts the idea that we have truly free will are:
1. Was mankind more free prior to the fall?
2. Was the will of God’s human creatures impacted by the fall? If so, to what extent?
3. Does unregenerate man have the power of will to do anything that pleases God?
4. Will we be able to sin and rebel against God in heaven?
5. Since there will be no possibility of sin and rebellion against God in heaven then doesn’t it follow that we will only be robots and unable to truly love God?
The fall was a radical disruption in the nature of mankind. No part of our humanity was untouched by the fall. This includes, of course, our will. In the garden man possessed the freedom of will to remain sinless and in perfect communion with God. Since the fall, however, we do not possess the ability to live sin-free lives. We are sinners both by nature and choice. We are not born neutral in regard to God. We are born separated from Him. We are “by nature children of wrath” (Eph 2). That means that apart from an act of grace we will not choose God.
Jesus said in John 8:34 that the one who sins is a slave to sin. Jesus’ statement is radically inclusive for we all sin (Rom 3:23). A slave is anything but free. How can we imagine our wills being entirely free while at the same time enslaved to sin? Clearly we are predisposed to sin. We are bound and we cannot free ourselves.
Philippians 2:13 says, “For it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for His good pleasure.” If we need God’s grace and power to give us the will to obey Him do we not also need His grace and power to give us the will to choose Him in the first place?
Interestingly, John Wesley, perhaps the most famous arminian absolutely rejected the idea of libertarian free will and held the Reformed and biblical doctrine of total depravity and man’s inability. He believed rightly that we are born with sinful wills rather than free wills and that no one chooses God unless God changes something fundamental about the condition of their heart (prevenient grace).
None of this means that our decisions are not meaningful or “free” in any sense. Indeed, we choose to do just exactly what we desire. We act with as much freedom as our nature allows. This is why Protestant theologians and even the Baptist Faith and Message refer to man’s free moral agency instead of free will. The term free agency is a more specific term meant to communicate the reality that man acts in accordance with his nature and desires and is therefore always responsible for his actions. God does not force us to take actions against our own willing desire. Even the Reformed doctrine of irresistible grace denies that God makes man choose something against his will. Rather, irresistible grace asserts that God so thoroughly triumphs over sinful man’s stubborn will that he now willingly and gladly turns to Christ in faith.
The vital question is, outside of Christ do we truly have the desire and the ability to “choose God”? The Bible answers with a resounding “No!” The following passages teach total depravity and man’s inability.
· John 3:19-21
· Romans 3:9-11, 18
· Romans 7:18
· Romans 8:5-9
· Romans 14:23
· I Cor 2:13-14
· Eph 2:1-5
· Col 1:21-22
· Hebrews 11:6
The idea of free will that is prominent in much of popular evangelicalism is not drawn directly from Scripture. It is an extrapolation based upon certain a priori assumptions. One of those assumptions is that the only way for a choice to be meaningful is if it is “free.” However, as discussed already every choice we make is impacted by internal and external forces. We are always being acted upon. Why is it that so many believe that God does not act upon the hearts of certain sinful people in such a way that will guide the choices they make? Has God surrendered the outcome of His eternal purposes in salvation up to the independent whims of sinful people?
Another assumption is that since we are called to repent and believe, then we must have the power and moral clarity to do so. How many of us have been told that “God will never command us to do something that we do not have the ability to do”? This sounds nice and logical. But the Scriptures have many examples of commandments that we cannot possibly live up to. “Be perfect therefore as your Heavenly Father is perfect.” “Be holy because I am holy.” “Pray without ceasing.” “Be joyful always.” Do you know anyone who is literally always joyful? What about the law of God? Did God think that the Israelites would perfectly obey His law? Of course not. But their inability was no cause for God to lower His standard. God requires that his law be kept wholly, perfectly. We are lost because we are born into Adam and have fallen short of God’s standard. This reality did not force God to change His previous expectation. Incidentally, our inability to keep the law is what makes the active obedience of Christ imputed to us such a glorious doctrine.
Let’s be careful not to be so committed to asserting the free will of man that we diminish the sovereign and free will of God.
Saturday, October 27, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
1. Was mankind more free prior to the fall?
Adam was in the direct presence of God, and God literally walked in the garden (Gen 3:8). What Adam lost by the fall was not freedom but direct communion with God. That we sin more than Adam, is not caused by lack of freedom, but lack on direct communion with God which made Adam less likely to sin, although as we know he still did sin.
2. Was the will of God’s human creatures impacted by the fall? If so, to what extent?
Yes, in that we no longer have direct communion with God and that has an impact on the will because we are more likely to forget him since we don't literally see him walking with us. It does not, however, make the will unfree. There is no such thing as a will that is not free. If the will is not free, it is not will either--for then it is a program not a will.
3. Does unregenerate man have the power of will to do anything that pleases God?
Unregenerate man keeps some of the commandments of God. Many unregenerate men do not commit adultery, or do not steal, or do not bear false witness. Surely God is pleased in that they keep this one commandment, although he is displeased that they break others. The question then is not whether unregenerate man can do anything pleasing to God, but whether any man other than Jesus Himself (whether regenerate or not, whether before the fall or afterwards) can do everything pleasing to God. To that, the answer is no.
4. Will we be able to sin and rebel against God in heaven?
Was Satan able to sin and rebel against God in heaven? Were there angels that left their first estate and are held in chains of darkness till the judgment? This is why salvation is NOT by faith alone, but also "holiness, without which no man shall see the Lord" Heb 12:14 for unless we learn to love God now and to conform our will to his, that is, to be conformed to the image of his Son (Rom 8:29) then we will not be saved, for God will not bring us to heaven simply to have us cast out as Lucifer.
5. Since there will be no possibility of sin and rebellion against God in heaven then doesn’t it follow that we will only be robots and unable to truly love God?
Nay, but it is taught in Scripture that God will not bring any man into heaven who has not learned obedience. As Paul says in 1 Cor 6:9 "Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,..." He doesn't say that such will inherit the kingdom of heaven while continuing in these sins because "once saved, always saved" or any other such foolishness. Learn obedience, therefore, or be banned from heaven. For Heb 5:8-9 says "Though he (Jesus) were a Son, yet learned he obedience by the things which he suffered; and being made perfect, he became the author of eternal salvation unto all them that obey him;" -- Jesus saves those that obey Jesus, not just those who mentally assent to this or that fact about him.
Egomakarios,
1. First of all the reason Adam could choose not to sin was because he did not have a sin nature. Secondly, Adam did not sin until he ate of the tree with his wife. You are also saying that there are parts of man's nature that were unaffected by the fall. You are formulating an entirely new interpretation of man's state prior to and after the fall. I hope you get this in a book at some point. Actually, you are not saying anything that cannot be found in the writings of Pelagius.
2. I'm trying to figure out exactly what you're saying. But again, it seems you are asserting that man's character is not entirely fallen. I'm wondering where in Scripture you can back up your claim that the only reason we sin is because we are not in the presence of God every day. We sin because we are fallen. We are "in Adam." Perhaps you should study Romans 5.
3. Wow! I am amazed. I am not being sarcastic but I would honestly like to know if you have ANY formal training in the Bible or theology. Your answers are truly novel. I am not aware of any theologian or Bible scholars that says what you are saying.
Romans 8:7-8 - "For the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God's law; indeed it cannot. Those who are in the flesh cannot please God."
Paul's phrase "the mind set on the flesh" is a coloquialism for unregenerate man. Clearly there are unregenerate people who do not commit adultery, for instance. But the unregenerate heart, being inclined away from God, is not pleasing to God even when behavior is conformed to external rules.
4. Wow again! You have just undone historic biblical orthodoxy. So, not only will we be able to rebel against God in heaven and thus be cast into hell but we are saved by a combination of faith and works. Not even Roman Catholics are so bold as to deny God's grace so egregiously!
You absolutely butcher Hebrews 12:14. The writer is not talking about OUR holiness but the holiness of Christ. We do not approach the throne of God covered by our righteousness but the righteousness of Christ! My righteousness is like filthy rags. I need the perfect righteousness of Christ imputed to me. How can you not know this?
5. So, we are saved by our obedience to Jesus. Your exegesis of Scripture is the worst I have encountered since I started this blog. That is quite an accomplishment egomakarios.
Your comments drip with pride. Do you actually believe that your obedience is good enough for a holy God to accept as meritorious?
Now, I need to warn you against your false doctrine and distortion of the precious Gospel of our Lord Jesus.
"I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel...But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed...If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed" (Gal. 1:6-9).
I am going to leave your post because it is such a disturbing example of how the Gospel is so easily distorted.
Please do not post again at 1517. ALL of your future posts will be removed. I have no desire to continue to cast the pearls of God's Word on your unlistening heart. I do plead with you however to study thoroughly the book of Romans. And since you have no proper skills in biblical interpretation please use a good commentary.
I recommend the commentaries by John Murray, Leon Morris and Doug Moo.
Farewell egomakarios. Please don't waist your time by continuing to post nonsense. You have your own blog site on which to post nonesense.
Egomakarios,
I requested that you no longer blog to this site. Please honor that request. You are not making any sense. In this post you call what Paul teaches in Romans 5 a "gag". Unbelievable.
Todd...
1.) I know you like Rush.
2.) I know are not Arminian in theology.
3.) I know Rush was compared to such.
4.) I know you enjoy YouTube.
5.) I know you have a sense of humor.
6.) I know you will appreciate this.
7.) Watch it here... http://chasinglions.blogspot.com/2007/01/ode-to-free-will.html
egomakarios,
Which part of my last post did you not understand. I will no longer respond to your distortions of the Gospel. I have already done so and you have demonstrated a complete lack of teachability. Consequently, I am done with you. Go spread your malice somewhere else.
I do believe that God is completely soveriegn, but it is very difficult for me to grasp all of this. My confusion comes when I read passages that encourage beleivers to examine the fruit of their life to see if they are in the faith, or other passages that encourage us to run the race with perseverance. Why would the New Testament be full of these admonitions, when we have nothing to do with it? If God chose us then we will be faithful and persevere, and if you're not chosen, then you won't, so put your Bible down and live how you want. These passages seem to be pointless warnings when I consider God's complete sovereignty. I'm really having trouble making it all fit together. Can you shed some light on this for me?
Post a Comment